nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 01, v.41 92-98
杭州外国语学院老校区艺体楼历保建筑墙体加固方案分析
基金项目(Foundation): 杭州市建设科研项目(2023286); 浙江省省直同人集团创新基金资助项目(2023008)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19740/j.2096-9872.2025.01.10
摘要:

杭州外国语学院老校区艺体楼历史保护建筑为建造于20世纪60年代的砌体结构。根据安全鉴定及抗震鉴定结果,其墙体抗压、抗剪承载力均严重不满足鉴定标准的要求,房屋鉴定单元安全性评级为Du级,抗震一、二级鉴定结果显示结构需要进行抗震加固。对墙体加固的几种方法进行了综合比较,选取了板墙加固及高延混凝土加固2种增设面层加固方式进行计算分析。通过计算发现,低强度砂浆砌体结构采用板墙加固对抗压承载力的提升显著,且高于对抗剪承载力的提升,高延混凝土加固对于抗剪承载力的提升效果优于对抗压承载力的提升。当采用板墙加固,抗震综合能力指数并未充分反映板墙混凝土及钢筋变化的影响,需要补充试验研究。

Abstract:

The art and sports building of the old campus of Hangzhou Foreign Studies University is a masonry structure built in the 1960s. According to the safety appraisal and seismic appraisal results, the compressive and shear bearing capacity of the wall seriously does not meet the requirements of the appraisal standards. The safety rating of the building appraisal unit is Du level, and the seismic first and second level appraisal results show that the structure needs seismic reinforcement. A comprehensive comparison was made on several methods of wall reinforcement, and two additional surface layer reinforcement methods, namely slab wall reinforcement and high extension concrete reinforcement, were selected for calculation and analysis. Through calculation, it was found that the use of slab wall reinforcement in low-strength mortar masonry structures significantly improves the compressive bearing capacity compared to the shear bearing capacity. High tensile concrete reinforcement has a better effect on improving the shear bearing capacity than on improving the compressive bearing capacity. When using slab wall reinforcement, the seismic comprehensive capacity index does not fully reflect the influence of changes in slab wall concrete and steel reinforcement, and additional experimental research is needed.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.民用建筑可靠性鉴定标准:GB 50292—2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development Reliability of the People's Republic of China.Reliability Appraisal Standard for Civil Buildings:GB 50292—2015 [S].Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2016.(in Chinese)

[2] 刘家亮,董牛晶,郭猛,等.《建筑抗震鉴定标准》(GB 50023—2009)相关问题分析及建议[J].建筑结构,2023,53(13):21-27.LIU J L,DONG N J,GUO M,et al.Analysis and suggestions on relevant issues of “Seismic Evaluation Standards for Buildings” (GB 50023—2009)[J].Building Structures,2023,53(13):21-27.(in Chinese)

[3] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震鉴定标准:GB 50023—2009[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development Reliability of the People's Republic of China.Standard for Seismic Evaluation of Buildings:GB 50023—2009[S].Beijing:ChinaArchitecture&Building Press,2009.(in Chinese)

[4] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.既有建筑鉴定与加固通用规范:GB 55021—2021[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2021.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development Reliability of the People's Republic of China.General Code for Appraisal and Reinforcement of Existing Buildings:GB55021—2021[S].Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2021.(in Chinese)

[5] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.砌体结构加固设计规范:GB 50702—2011[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development Reliability of the People's Republic of China.Code for Design of Reinforcement of Masonry Structures:GB 50702—2011 [S].Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press,2011.(in Chinese)

[6] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震加固技术规程:JGJ 116—2009[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development Reliability of the People's Republic of China.Technical Code for Seismic Reinforcement of Buildings:JGJ 116—2009[S].Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press,2009.(in Chinese)

[7] 吴清,许锦燕,刘湘,等.低强度砂浆砌体抗震加固设计分析[J].建筑结构,2020,50(12):116-120.WU Q,XU J Y,LIU X,et al.Analysis of seismic reinforcement design for low strength mortar masonry [J].Building Structures,2020,50(12):116-120.(in Chinese)

[8] 中国工程建设标准化协会,中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.高韧性混凝土加固砌体结构技术规程:T/CECS 997—2022[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2022.China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization.Technical specification for strengthening masonry structures with high toughness concrete:T/CECS 997—2022 [S].Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press,2022.(in Chinese)

[9] 李阳,张俏,张国庆.某老旧房屋砌体结构抗震加固及改造设计[J].建筑结构,2019,49(18):136-140,135.LI Y,ZHANG Q,ZHANG G Q.Seismic reinforcement and renovation design of masonry structure in an old house [J].Building Structure,2019,49 (18):136-140,135.(in Chinese)

[10] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计标准:GB/T 50011—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2024.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development Reliability of the People's Republic of China.Code for Seismic Design of Buildings:GB/T 50011—2010 [S].Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press,2024.(in Chinese)

[11] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.砌体结构设计规范:GB 50003—2011[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development Reliability of the People's Republic of China.Code for Design of Masonry Structures:GB 50003—2011 [S].Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press,2011.(in Chinese)

[12] 卢晨虎,宋波,王满生,等.考虑砌筑砂浆劣化的老旧砌体结构抗震性能分析[J].建筑结构,2024,54(9):139-143.LU C H,SONG B,WANG M S,et al.Seismic performance analysis of old masonry structures considering deterioration of masonry mortar [J].Building Structures,2024,54 (9):139-143.(in Chinese)

[13] 张玉梅.农村居民自建住房抗震鉴定加固探讨[J].建筑结构,2022,52(16):107-110.ZHANG Y M.Discussion on seismic identification and reinforcement of self built houses for rural residents [J].Building Structure,2022,52 (16):107-110.(in Chinese)

[14] 李丹,鲁亚,张学森,等.采用超高性能混凝土加固后的既有砌体结构抗震性能分析[J].建筑结构,2022,52(24):77-81.LI D,LU Y,ZHANG X S,et al.Seismic performance analysis of existing masonry structures reinforced with ultra-high performance concrete [J].Building Structures,2022,52 (24):77-81.(in Chinese)

[15] 毛筱霏,代兴鹏,何洁美,等.武安州塔动力特性与抗震性能分析[J].北京建筑大学学报,2024,40(3):102-108.MAO X F,DAI X P,HE J M,et al.Dynamic characteristics and seismic performance analysis of wu'anzhou tower [J].Journal of Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture,2024,40(3):102-108.(in Chinese)

[16] 赵英龙,王睿琳,杨琳.北京城中轴线保护区胡同有机更新探索——以国旺胡同适老化改造为例[J].北京建筑大学学报,2024,40(1):45-53.ZHAO Y L,WANG R L,YANG L.Exploration of organic renewal of hutongs in the beijing urban axis protection zone—taking the aging transformation of Guowang Hutong as an example[J].Journal of Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture,2024,40(1):45-53.(in Chinese)

基本信息:

DOI:10.19740/j.2096-9872.2025.01.10

中图分类号:TU746.3

引用信息:

[1]刘勇,肖洪,顾士星等.杭州外国语学院老校区艺体楼历保建筑墙体加固方案分析[J].北京建筑大学学报,2025,41(01):92-98.DOI:10.19740/j.2096-9872.2025.01.10.

基金信息:

杭州市建设科研项目(2023286); 浙江省省直同人集团创新基金资助项目(2023008)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文